Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary

Dictionary Lookup Custom Solutions

Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆

Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

how the word is used
frequency of use
it is used more often in oral or written speech
word translation options
usage examples (several phrases with translation)
etymology

Request For Comments - translation to italian

PUBLICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDS FOR THE INTERNET

RFC 1; Request for comment; Requests for comment; Tags for the Identification of Languages; Request For Comments; Request For Comment; RFC Editor; RFC editor; Requests for Comments; Requests for Comment; Requests for comments; IETF RFC; Request for comments; RFCs; Request for Comment; RFC 2119; Request for Comment Identifier; Request for Comments Identifier; RFC (identifier); 10.17487; Informational RFC

Request For Comments

RFC (Richiesta di commenti, brutta copia del IETF, documenti contenenti consigli per gli utenti Internet)

request for proposal

REQUEST MADE BY AN AGENCY OR COMPANY INTERESTED IN PROCUREMENT OF A COMMODITY OR SERVICE, ASKING POTENTIAL SUPPLIERS TO SUBMIT BUSINESS PROPOSALS

RFP; Request for price quotation; Request For Proposal; Request for Proposals; Request for Proposal; Request for proposals; Call for proposal; Call for Proposals; RFP automation; RFP Automation; Call for proposals; RFEI

richiesta di offerta (di prezzo)

by request

WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE

By Request (album); By Request (disambiguation)

si prega di non inviare fiori

Definition

Request For Comments

<standard> (RFC) One of a series, begun in 1969, of numbered Internet informational documents and standards widely followed by commercial software and freeware in the Internet and Unix communities. Few RFCs are standards but all Internet standards are recorded in RFCs. Perhaps the single most influential RFC has been RFC 822, the Internet electronic mail format standard. The RFCs are unusual in that they are floated by technical experts acting on their own initiative and reviewed by the Internet at large, rather than formally promulgated through an institution such as ANSI. For this reason, they remain known as RFCs even once adopted as standards. The RFC tradition of pragmatic, experience-driven, after-the-fact standard writing done by individuals or small working groups has important advantages over the more formal, committee-driven process typical of ANSI or ISO. Emblematic of some of these advantages is the existence of a flourishing tradition of "joke" RFCs; usually at least one a year is published, usually on April 1st. Well-known joke RFCs have included 527 ("ARPAWOCKY", R. Merryman, UCSD; 22 June 1973), 748 ("Telnet Randomly-Lose Option", Mark R. Crispin; 1 April 1978), and 1149 ("A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers", D. Waitzman, BBN STC; 1 April 1990). The first was a Lewis Carroll pastiche; the second a parody of the TCP/IP documentation style, and the third a deadpan skewering of standards-document legalese, describing protocols for transmitting Internet data packets by carrier pigeon. The RFCs are most remarkable for how well they work - they manage to have neither the ambiguities that are usually rife in informal specifications, nor the committee-perpetrated misfeatures that often haunt formal standards, and they define a network that has grown to truly worldwide proportions. rfc.net (http://rfc.net/). {W3 (http://w3.org/hypertext/DataSources/Archives/RFC_sites.html)}. JANET UK FTP (ftp://nic.ja.net/pub/newsfiles/JIPS/rfc). Imperial College, UK FTP (ftp://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/rfc/). Nexor UK (http://nexor.com/public/rfc/index/rfc.html). {Ohio State U (http://cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/faq/usenet/top.html)}. See also For Your Information, STD. (1997-11-10)

Show more definitions

Wikipedia

Request for Comments

A Request for Comments (RFC) is a publication in a series from the principal technical development and standards-setting bodies for the Internet, most prominently the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). An RFC is authored by individuals or groups of engineers and computer scientists in the form of a memorandum describing methods, behaviors, research, or innovations applicable to the working of the Internet and Internet-connected systems. It is submitted either for peer review or to convey new concepts, information, or, occasionally, engineering humor.

The IETF adopts some of the proposals published as RFCs as Internet Standards. However, many RFCs are informational or experimental in nature and are not standards. The RFC system was invented by Steve Crocker in 1969 to help record unofficial notes on the development of ARPANET. RFCs have since become official documents of Internet specifications, communications protocols, procedures, and events. According to Crocker, the documents "shape the Internet's inner workings and have played a significant role in its success", but are not widely known outside the community.

Outside of the Internet community, other documents also called requests for comments have been published in U.S. Federal government work, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request for Comments

Examples of use of Request For Comments

1. "The Labor Ministry's request for comments on the draft law represents an important step toward reform and transparency in the UAE," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch.

2. This consultation document follows from an earlier request for comments on this subject issued by the TRA in April of this year, the results of which have been taken into account in preparing this one.

3. Federal Communications Commission on Monday issued a request for comments on what it could do to address concerns by U.S. carriers that are upset at various surcharges they are now facing to directly connect calls to those countries.

4. Baccus, president of the Kansas Farm Bureau and chairman of the Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., the Iowa firm that now owns Crop 1, said its plan saved farmers "over $4 million and has a '4 percent retention rate." In February 2005, federal regulators received about 800 letters in response to a request for comments on the Crop 1 plan.